Public private partnership - experiences of ICT in the UK, Germany and Austria

McQuaid, Ronald W and Scherrer, Walter (2006) Public private partnership - experiences of ICT in the UK, Germany and Austria. In: 12th International Public Private Partnerships Conference, 22nd-24th June 2006, Riga, Latvia.

[img] Microsoft Word
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (198kB)
PDF (Published version of article)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (229kB)


The political context of governments differs between the UK, Germany and Austria, but each government currently has a positive view of PPP. There are many similarities to the drivers for PPPs in Austria, Germany and the UK. The UK has had more experience, and the conservative-led government in Austria has been moving towards greater use of PPPs of the “privatisation”-type, but only very cautiously towards PPPs of the “PFI-type”. The major motives for moving towards PPPs are macro-economic or budgetary, especially in Germany and Austria, but also micro-economic or improving the efficiency of public service delivery, especially in the UK. In all three countries PPPs appear to be a systematic middle response to the alternatives of privatisation or public service provision of infrastructure and operational support. There are more significant multi-tiered levels of government in the Federal systems of Germany and Austria, with many autonomous players including federal government, states and municipalities. Investment by the latter two exceeds investment expenditure of the federal government. In the more centralised UK system policies towards PPPs have been relatively rapid and similar, although not identical, across the UK. In Germany the search for a comprehensive approach (“Gesamtkonzept”) has slowed the dissemination of PPP; Austria seems to handle the issue more pragmatically. One issue that remains crucial to the future impacts of PPPs is whether they offer genuine and sustainable increases in efficiency and effectiveness compared the alternatives. If they do then they should have a positive impact on future public resource availability, but if they do not then they may provide short-term financial and political benefits but at the cost of constraining future decision makers and placing greater pressures on public finances in the longer-term

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: PPP; public private partnership; PFI; public finance;
University Divisions/Research Centres: Edinburgh Napier University, Employment Research Institute
Dewey Decimal Subjects: 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics > 332 Financial economics
300 Social sciences > 330 Economics > 336 Public finance
Library of Congress Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance
Item ID: 2768
Depositing User: Mrs Lyn Gibson
Date Deposited: 16 Jul 2009 13:42
Last Modified: 22 Oct 2014 13:27

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Edinburgh Napier University is a registered Scottish charity. Registration number SC018373