News cultures and new social movements: radical journalism and the mainstream media.

Atton, Chris (2002) News cultures and new social movements: radical journalism and the mainstream media. Journalism Studies, 3 (4). pp. 491-505. ISSN 1461-670X

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)


Radical media can be viewed as an extremely democratic form of communication, where people
normally denied access to the mainstream media are able to speak on issues that concern them. Radical
media are especially important for new social movements, where “activist-journalists” seek to establish a
counter-discourse to those typically found in mainstream media. One striking technique employed in radical
media is “native reporting”, where first-person, activist accounts of events are preferred over more detached
commentaries. Most accounts of radical media have treated such practices as unique and defining characteristics of radical media. Little attention has been paid to how these practices might be employed by mainstream media, or indeed to how radical media might borrow practices from the mainstream. This paper moves away from previous binary approaches to explore the relations between radical and mainstream media through a comparative analysis of the coverage of the protests at the G8 summit, held in Genoa in
July 2001. The paper argues that borrowings and interdependency are most likely to come from papers that
share a similar ideology; hence it compares a member of the UK radical press (SchNEWS) with a member
of the liberal press (The Guardian). The analysis is hegemonic, and is particularly interested in how transfers
of journalistic techniques, values and ideologies are transformed under differing conditions. Is a counterhegemonic
discourse inevitably diluted by the adoption of its primary features in the mainstream press? Is
it possible to radicalise mainstream journalistic practices? The analysis focuses on the presence and nature
of “witnessing” by activists, the stylistic construction of such witnessing and how such techniques are
transformed in the liberal press. It also examines relationships and attitudes between radical and mainstream
journalists. The paper �nds that whilst there are distinctive journalistic techniques used in each paper, both radical and mainstream adopt elements from each other, whether in writing style or in news values and
framing. The counter-discourse of radical media appears to gain strength from its borrowings. It is argued
that the liberal press’s use of native reporting represents an accommodation with a radical technique. Finally,a hegemonic approach suggests a complexity of relations between radical and mainstream that previous
binary models have not been able to identify.

Item Type: Article
Print ISSN: 1461-670X
Electronic ISSN: 1469-9699
Additional Information: paper also presented at Scottish Media and Communication Association Annual Conference, Bridge of Allan on 26th October 2001
Uncontrolled Keywords: News; Cultures; Social Movements; Journalism; Mainstream Media; Radicalism;
University Divisions/Research Centres: Faculty of Engineering, Computing and Creative Industries > School of Arts & Creative Industries
Dewey Decimal Subjects: 000 Computer science, information & general works > 070 News media, journalism & publishing
300 Social sciences > 300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 302 Social interaction
300 Social sciences > 320 Political science
300 Social sciences > 300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 300 Social sciences
Library of Congress Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Item ID: 2212
Depositing User: RAE Import
Date Deposited: 28 Jan 2008 10:24
Last Modified: 17 Jun 2013 09:31

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Edinburgh Napier University is a registered Scottish charity. Registration number SC018373